![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mainly, that decision was made because it would be impossible for another fake documentary to have the same impact, and obviously lying about the movie’s authenticity couldn’t be pulled off twice. The first obvious discrepancy between the two installments is that Book of Shadows is not found footage. It’s also reminiscent of the way hardcore Blair Witch fans painstakingly analyzed every single frame for clues the process of viewing The Blair Witch Project is the plot of its sequel. It’s like a much more sinister version of The Hangover. The tapes are perfectly intact, though, and so they soon begin combing through the footage to figure out what happened the previous night. That night, the group drinks heavily and completely blacks out, waking up to discover their documents shredded and their cameras destroyed. ![]() Berlinger pokes fun at everyone involved in this madness, including himself for profiting off of it. the studio executives who funded Book of Shadows). Each of the characters in Book of Shadows represents a different reaction to The Blair Witch Project, from those interested in analyzing its legitimacy to Wiccans offended by their portrayal on screen to people who just want to capitalize on the whole ordeal (i.e. This ingenious premise would later be copied in similar sequels like Grave Encounters 2. How cool is that? Five protagonists take a tour of the woods where Blair Witch was shot, just as any cinema geek may want to visit the set of their favorite horror film. In the world of Book of Shadows, The Blair Witch Project was a fictional movie, and the characters themselves are fans of it, thus placing them on our level. This story, we find out, takes place in our universe during the immediate aftermath of the original picture’s release. Easy, right? Instead, he opted for something different, a movie that comments on its predecessor and manages to work the Blair Witch craze into the plot.īook of Shadows opens with real footage of TV hosts like Conan O’Brien and Roger Ebert talking about the previous film. Give audiences precisely what they ate up last time. Have a few more kids go into the woods and get murdered while screaming and shaking the camera. Sixteen years removed from the hype, horror junkies may even find something to appreciate.ĭirector Joe Berlinger could have very easily repeated the formula with Book of Shadows in order to cash in. But putting aside the fact that this followup is certainly not as effective as the original, and keeping in mind its troubled production, Book of Shadows is not nearly as worthless as one might expect. What isn’t as commonly discussed is the sequel, Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2, which was rushed into theaters one year later, earning the scorn of fans everywhere before being exiled to the DVD bargain bin. Blair Witch helped usher in the found-footage craze, and while it may not terrify modern viewers the way it did audiences in 1999, it’s still remembered fondly as an important piece of horror history. You know the story: two young directors make a minimalist independent picture and, thanks to an impeccable marketing campaign, manage to convince much of the world their movie is real. It would be difficult to overstate how momentous an event The Blair Witch Project was, and its legacy continues on to this day. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |